A bit of history: Michelson一点历史:迈克尔逊
When Clerk Maxwell wrote to D.P. Todd of the U.S. Nautical Almanac Office in Washington in 1879, he inquired about the possibility of measuring the velocity of the solar system through the ether by observing the eclipses of Jupiter's moons. Roemer had used measurements of the eclipse times to obtain a number for the speed of light. Maxwell concluded that the effects he sought were too small to measure - but that assertion came to the attention of a young naval instructor named A. A. Michelson who had just been transferred to that office. In 1878, Michelson had made an excellent measurement of the speed of light at the age of 25, and he thought the detection of motion through the ether might be measurable. 当克劳斯·麦克斯韦于1879年写信给美国航海天文台办公室的D.P. Todd,询问是否可以通过观测木星卫星的食现象来测量太阳系通过以太的速度时,他提出了这一问题。罗默曾利用食现象的时间测量得到了光速的数值。麦克斯韦得出结论,他所寻求的效果太小,无法测量——但这一结论引起了刚被调任到该办公室的年轻海军教员A.A.迈克尔逊的注意。1878年,迈克尔逊在25岁时已做出非常精确的光速测量,他认为通过以太的运动可能是可以测量的。
Michelson proceeded to invent a new instrument with accuracy far exceeding that which had been attained to that date, and that instrument is now universally called the Michelson interferometer. In trying to measure the speed of the Earth through the supposed "ether", you could depend upon one component of that velocity being known - the velocity of the Earth around the sun, about 30 km/s. Using a wavelength of about 600 nm, there should be a shift of about 0.04 fringes as the spectrometer was rotated 360°. Though small, this was well within Michelson's capability. Michelson, and everyone else, was surprised that there was no shift. Michelson's terse description of the experiment: "The interpretation of these results is that there is no displacement of the interference bands. ... The result of the hypothesis of a stationary ether is thus shown to be incorrect." (A. A. Michelson, Am. J. Sci, 122, 120 (1881)) 迈克尔孙试图发明一种精度远超以往的新型仪器,这种仪器现在普遍被称为迈克尔孙干涉仪。在尝试测量地球通过所谓‘以太’的运动速度时,你可以依赖其中的一个速度分量——地球绕太阳的公转速度,约为30 km/s。使用约600纳米的波长,当光谱仪旋转360°时,应该会有约0.04条干涉条纹的移动。尽管这个数值很小,但仍在迈克尔孙的测量能力范围内。迈克尔孙对实验的简要描述是:‘这些结果的解释是干涉条纹没有发生位移。……以太假说的结论因此被证明是错误的。’(A. A. Michelson, Am. J. Sci, 122, 120 (1881))
The proponents of an "ether" as a propagating medium for the light were not ready to give up the idea, and proposed that the Earth dragged the ether along with it in its orbit, thus accounting for the negative result of the interferometer experiment. Lord Rayleigh wrote to Michelson, urging him to repeat the experiment with greater accuracy to test these hypotheses. Michelson, with the collaboration of E. W. Morley, constructed a new interferometer with multiple mirrors and a pathlength about 10 times longer. This device should have given a fringe shift of about 0.4, but they observed less than 0.005 fringe (A. A. Michelson and E. W. Morley, Am. J. Sci., 134, 333 (1887)). Although repeated over the next 40 years with ever greater precision and the same negative result, this 1887 experiment is pointed to as one of the experimental foundations of relativity, and earned Michelson the Nobel Prize in 1907. 支持‘以太’作为光的传播介质的人们并未放弃这一想法,并提出地球在轨道运动时会拖带以太一起运动,从而解释了干涉仪实验的负结果。瑞利勋爵写信给迈克尔逊,敦促他以更高的精度重复实验以检验这些假设。迈克尔逊与E. W. 莫雷合作,建造了一个配备多个反射镜的新型干涉仪,其路径长度大约是原来的10倍。这种装置应产生约0.4个干涉条纹的位移,但他们观测到的却不到0.005个条纹(A. A. Michelson和E. W. Morley,Am. J. Sci., 134, 333 (1887))。尽管在接下来的40年中不断以更高的精度重复,但结果始终为负,这一1887年的实验被指出是相对论实验基础之一,并使迈克尔逊在1907年获得诺贝尔奖。
![]()
|
Index French Ch 2 索引 法语 第2章 | ||
|
Go Back
返回 |
The Mysterious Ether神秘的以太
When we reached the point where we could demonstrate that light was a wave, then it was presumed that the wave must have a medium in which to travel. All the other waves we knew about required a medium. Since no medium was apparent between the earth and the sun, it was presumed that this medium was transparent and therefore not readily observable - it was called the "ether". The popular presumption was that this ether was stationary and filled all of space. This involved the presumption that there was an absolute reference frame in the universe, and that all the movement of planets and stars was through this ether. 当我们能够证明光是一种波时,人们便假定这种波必须有一种介质来传播。我们所知道的其他所有波都需要介质。由于在地球和太阳之间似乎没有介质,人们便假定这种介质是透明的,因此不易被观察到——它被称为‘以太’。普遍的假定是这种以太是静止的,并且充满了整个空间。这涉及假定宇宙中存在一个绝对的参考系,而所有行星和恒星的运动都是通过这个以太进行的。
These presumptions were part of the historical setting of the Michelson-Morley Experiment. With the interferometer which he invented, Michelson found no evidence of the ether, to his and everyone else's surprise. Michelson's terse description of the experiment: "The interpretation of these results is that there is no displacement of the interference bands. ... The result of the hypothesis of a stationary ether is thus shown to be incorrect." (A. A. Michelson, Am. J. Sci, 122, 120 (1881)) 这些假设是迈克耳孙-莫雷实验的历史背景的一部分。借助他发明的干涉仪,迈克耳孙未能发现以太的迹象,这令他和所有人感到惊讶。迈克耳孙对实验的简要描述是:'这些结果的解释是,干涉条纹没有发生位移。……以太假说的结论因此被证明是错误的。'(A. A. Michelson, Am. J. Sci, 122, 120 (1881))
The proponents of an "ether" as a propagating medium for the light were not ready to give up the idea, and proposed that the Earth dragged the ether along with it in its orbit, thus accounting for the negative result of the interferometer experiment. Lord Rayleigh wrote to Michelson, urging him to repeat the experiment with greater accuracy to test these hypotheses. Repeated over the next 40 years with ever greater precision and the same negative result, this 1887 experiment is pointed to as one of the experimental foundations of relativity, and earned Michelson the Nobel Prize in 1907. 支持‘以太’作为光传播介质的人们并未放弃这一想法,并提出地球在轨道上拖带以太,从而解释了干涉仪实验的负结果。瑞利勋爵写信给迈克尔逊,敦促他以更高的精度重复实验以检验这些假说。在接下来的40年中,该实验被反复进行,精度不断提高,但结果始终为负。这一1887年的实验被视作相对论实验基础之一,并使迈克尔逊于1907年获得诺贝尔奖。
While proponents for the existence of a medium in space, an "ether", still exist, the standard position is that there is no medium in space. One of the reasons for this position is that there was no direct experimental evidence for the existence of the ether - everything can be explained without it, hence the Ockham's razor approach. Another involves the preposterous mechanical properties required of a medium which supports a wave at 3 x 108 m/s. The velocity of any medium-dependent wave has the nature of the square root of an elastic property divided by an inertial or density property. To support a wave speed of the speed of light would require an incredibly high "stiffness" for space which has near zero density. A medium so tenuous that it produced no detectable drag on the planets which moved through it must yet have an incredibly high restoring force to bring it back to equilibrium once the planet passed. 尽管仍有人主张在空间中存在一种介质,即‘以太’,但主流观点认为空间中并不存在这样的介质。这一观点的一个原因是,没有直接的实验证据证明以太的存在——一切都可以在不引入以太的情况下得到解释,因此遵循奥卡姆剃刀原则。另一个原因是,为了支持一种在空间中以3×10⁸ m/s传播的波,所需的介质机械性质是荒谬的。任何依赖介质传播的波的速度本质上是弹性性质与惯性或密度性质平方根的比值。要支持光速这样的波速,就需要空间具有极高的‘刚性’,而空间的密度几乎为零。一种如此稀薄的介质,它对行星运动所产生的拖拽效应无法被检测到,却必须具有极高的恢复力,以在行星通过后将其带回平衡状态。
|
Index French Ch 2 索引 法语 第2章 | ||
|
Go Back
返回 |