Temporary Threshold Shifts暂时性阈值移位
Loud concerts can cause temporary shifts in the threshold of hearing in the mid frequency region. In one study, a group of 20 young adult females were exposed to sound at 110 dB for 60 minutes, 3 minutes on and 1 minute off to simulate a concert. The results were: 大声音乐会可能引起中频区域听力阈值的暂时变化。在一项研究中,20名年轻成年人被暴露在110分贝的噪音下,持续60分钟,每3分钟开1分钟关,以模拟音乐会。结果为:
Emphasizing the wide variability of such tests, 2 of the subjects showed greater than 40 dB threshold shift at 4000 Hz while 9 showed less than 20 dB. None showed a loss (shift) above the guideline at 1000Hz or 8000 Hz, so the shifts are concentrated in the maximum sensitivity range of human hearing. There is no firmly established correlation between temporary threshold shifts and permanent threshold shifts. However, it is prudent to point out that if permanent hearing damage followed the pattern of the temporary threshold shifts, it would be the worst kind of damage because it would diminish hearing acuity in the frequency range that is most important for the understanding of human speech. 强调这类测试的广泛变异性,有2个受试者在4000Hz处的阈值移位超过40dB,而9个受试者在该频率下的移位小于20dB。在1000Hz或8000Hz处,没有受试者表现出超过指南值的损失(移位),因此这些移位集中在人类听觉最敏感的频率范围内。目前尚无明确的关联性将暂时性阈值移位与永久性阈值移位联系起来。然而,指出如果永久性听力损伤遵循暂时性阈值移位的模式,将是最严重的损害类型,因为这种损害会降低对人类语音理解最为重要的频率范围的听觉敏锐度。
|
Index Hearing concepts Dangers of Loud Sounds Sound level measurement Reference "Am I Too Loud" 索引 声学概念 响声的危险 声级测量 参考 '我是否太响了' | |||||||||||||||
|
Go Back
返回 |
Audiometry of Rock Musicians摇滚乐手的听力检查
Since controlled studies of human subjects which might do harm cannot be ethically carried out, one alternative is to find persons who voluntarily subject themselves to very loud sounds and measure their hearing. Such an effort was made in Britain with a group of 42 musicians who agreed to a hearing screen every three years. 由于无法在伦理允许的情况下对人类进行可能造成伤害的控制研究,另一种替代方法是寻找自愿让自己暴露在非常大声声音中的人员,并测量他们的听力。英国曾有一项这样的研究,涉及42名音乐家,他们每三年接受一次听力测试。
The study is not very meaningful because of the small numbers, but it is consistent with the study of temporary threshold shifts in that the damage was in the mid-range frequencies.
由于数据量小,这项研究的意义并不大,但它与关于暂时性阈值位移的研究是一致的,因为损害发生在中频范围。 |
Index Hearing concepts Dangers of Loud Sounds Sound level measurement Reference "Am I Too Loud" 索引 声学概念 响声的危险 声级测量 参考 '我是否太响了' | |||||||||||||
|
Go Back
返回 |
Animal Studies动物研究
Some animal studies have attempted to assess hearing damage from loud sounds. One British study subjected a group of 6 chinchillas to rock music for 2.5 hours at 1 meter from a loudspeaker (average 107 dBA) and then did histological studies of their inner ears. There was a large variation in the the amount of damage done to their inner ears. Perhaps those with a small amount of damage were in the corner of their cage with their paws over their ears. The only significant outcome seems to be the variability - if there is wide variability in the damage to these animal's ears, it would not be surprising if the susceptibility of human's ears also show wide variability in the vulnerability to damage. The problem is that you would not know whether you are particularly susceptible to damage until you had sustained damage. 一些动物研究尝试评估大声响造成的听力损伤。一项英国研究将一组6只雪貂置于距扬声器1米处,暴露于摇滚音乐2.5小时(平均107 dBA),然后对它们的内耳进行了组织学研究。它们的内耳损伤程度存在很大差异。也许那些损伤较轻的个体可能在笼子的角落,爪子盖在耳朵上。似乎唯一的显著结果是这种变异性——如果这些动物的耳朵损伤存在很大差异,那么人类的耳朵对损伤的敏感性也存在很大差异也就不足为奇。问题在于,你直到已经遭受了损伤,才不会知道自己是否特别容易受到损伤。
|
Index Hearing concepts Dangers of Loud Sounds Sound level measurement Reference "Am I Too Loud" 索引 声学概念 响声的危险 声级测量 参考 '我是否太响了' | ||
|
Go Back
返回 |
Can you limit sound levels?你能限制声音的强度吗?
In 1973 the Leeds City Council in Britain limited their discoteques to a sound level of 96 dBA peak by a license restriction. In the face of legal action a year later, the restriction was removed. The Association of Ballrooms mounted the successful legal challenge by showing that the the equivalent continuous sound level could not be assessed visually with a sound level meter and that the peak intensity of concerts exceeded the average by about 10 dBA. The controversy spawned numerous studies of concert sound levels. Typical results: 1973年,英国利兹市议会限制了舞厅的噪音水平,规定每场舞会的峰值噪音水平不得超过96 dBA。一年后,面对法律诉讼,该限制被取消。舞厅协会通过展示,证明无法仅凭视觉判断等效连续噪音水平,且音乐会的峰值强度比平均值高出约10 dBA,从而成功发起法律挑战。这一争议引发了对音乐会噪音水平的大量研究。典型结果:
|
Index Hearing concepts Dangers of Loud Sounds Sound level measurement Reference "Am I Too Loud" 索引 声学概念 响声的危险 声级测量 参考 '我是否太响了' | |||||
|
Go Back
返回 |
OSHA Workplace StandardsOSHA 工作场所标准
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) established a national workplace standard for noise exposure called the OSHA Hearing Conservation Standard 29 CFR 1910.95. It limits the time-weighted-average noise exposure for unprotected workers according to the following table. 职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)制定了一个国家工作场所噪声暴露标准,称为OSHA听力保护标准29 CFR 1910.95。该标准根据以下表格,限制了未受保护工人的时间加权平均噪声暴露。
Maximum impact noise 140 dBA 最大噪声 140 dBA
|
Index Hearing concepts Dangers of Loud Sounds Sound level measurement Reference "Am I Too Loud" 索引 声学概念 响声的危险 声级测量 参考 '我是否太响了' | ||||||||||||||||
|
Go Back
返回 | ||||||||||||||||