Mean Free Path Calculation for Hard Spheres and Viscous Gas硬球和粘性气体的平均自由程计算
The mean free path of molecules in a gas can be modeled with the assumption that the molecules are hard spheres, and it can be modeled based on the viscosity of the gas. The intent here is to compare the results. 气体中分子的平均自由程可以基于分子是硬球的假设进行建模,也可以基于气体的粘度进行建模。此处的意图是进行比较。 中文译文中的待填/计算数值依次对应:1:mfb 2:mfp。实际数值以上方原输入框为准。 This calculation is just an investigation to see how closely the modeling of mean free path by hard sphere geometry and by projection from gas viscosity agree. For the projection from viscosity, standard air is used as the default, so that the values for air from the table above are substituted if no values are entered for the relevant parameters. Those values can be changed. As an example of model parameters, if you use 760mmHg for gas pressure, 0.3nm for molecular diameter, and 524.07R for temperature (the standard temperature for air in the table), the hard sphere calculation gives a mean free path of 99nm. If for the same temperature and using the standard value for air viscosity, 0.01827 centiPoise, the calculated mean free path is 65nm. If you adjust the hard sphere diameter to 0.3697nm, you bring the two estimates of mean free path into agreement, but I have no idea whether you can attach physical significance to this agreement. I would be interested in any physical data which might bear on this question. 这个计算只是为了考察用硬球几何模型和通过气体粘度投影来模拟平均自由程的准确性。对于通过粘度进行投影的情况,使用标准空气作为默认值,因此如果未输入相关参数的值,则使用表中空气的值。这些值可以被更改。例如,如果使用760mmHg作为气体压力,0.3nm作为分子直径,以及524.07R作为温度(表中标准空气温度),硬球模型计算出的平均自由程为99nm。如果在相同温度下使用标准空气粘度值0.01827厘泊,计算出的平均自由程为65nm。如果你将硬球直径调整为0.3697nm,就可以使两个平均自由程的估计值达成一致,但我并不知道这种一致性是否具有物理意义。我非常希望有任何相关的物理数据能够对此问题提供见解。 References: 参考文献: 分子质量表
|
Index Kinetic theory concepts 索引 气体动理论概念 | ||
|
Go Back
返回 |