Equal Loudness Curves等响曲线
![]() Fletcher and Munson are credited with pioneering work in the 1930s to develop equal-loudness curves, contributing significantly to the understanding of the loudness response of the human ear. Sets of equal-loudness contours are still often referred to as Fletcher-Munson curves. The above curves follow the equal-loudness curves resulting from the measurements of Robinson and Dadson in the mid 1950s and are adapted from the depiction of the curves in Donald Hall's book "Musical Acoustics". Subsequent measurements of the human ear's loudness response were standardized under the designation ISO 226 Standard. ![]() 弗莱彻和穆恩森在20世纪30年代开创性地进行了工作,以开发等响度曲线,对人类听觉的响度响应有了重要贡献。等响度轮廓线集仍经常被称为弗莱彻-穆恩森曲线。上述曲线遵循的是罗宾逊和达森在1950年代中期测量得到的等响度曲线,并改编自道尔顿·霍尔的著作《音乐声学》中的曲线描绘。后续的人类听觉响度响应测量则按照ISO 226标准进行了标准化。 This illustration seeks to show the difference between the more recent ISO 226:2003 set of equal-loudness curves and the Robinson & Dadson curves. Most notable is the fact that the curves are steeper in the low to mid loudness levels for low frequencies. The measurements were made with individuals of normal hearing in the 18-25 year age range.
这张图旨在展示较新的ISO 226:2003系列等响曲线与Robinson & Dadson曲线之间的差异。最显著的是,低频在低至中等响度水平处的曲线更为陡峭。这些测量是在18至25岁听力正常的个体上进行的。 |
Index Hearing concepts References: Donald Hall Ch 6, Fig 6:12 ISO 226:2003 Standard Equal Loudness wiki 索引 声学概念 参考文献:Donald Hall 第6章,图6:12 ISO 226:2003 标准 等响度 wiki | ||
|
Go Back
返回 |
Annotated Equal Loudness Curves标注的等响曲线
Click on any of the highlighted text for further details about the equal loudness curves. 点击任何高亮的文本以了解有关等响度曲线的更多信息。 ![]()
|
Index Loudness concepts Hearing concepts 索引 响度概念 听觉概念 | ||
|
Go Back
返回 |
Example of Information from Equal Loudness Curves等响曲线上的信息示例
Three example curves from the equal loudness curves are shown below, corresponding to very soft, midrange and very loud sounds. 以下所示的三条等响曲线对应非常安静、中等强度和非常响亮的声音。
![]() Examination of these three curves makes it evident that there is considerable difference between the ear's response at different sound levels. The response to very loud sounds is much "flatter" or more uniform than the response to very soft sounds, although it still shows the prominent enhancement of sensitivity between about 2000-5000Hz associated with the ear canal resonance. Where the curve dips between 2000-5000Hz, this implies that less sound intensity is necessary for the ear to perceive the same loudness as a 120dB, 1000Hz tone. In contrast, the strong rise in the curve for 0 phons at low frequencies shows that the ear has a notable discrimination against low frequencies for very soft sounds. 对这三个曲线的考察表明,人耳在不同声音强度下的响应存在显著差异。对于非常响亮的声音,其响应要“更平坦”或更均匀,相较于非常安静的声音,尽管它仍然显示出在约2000-5000Hz范围内与耳道共振相关的灵敏度显著增强。当曲线在2000-5000Hz范围内下降时,这意味着对于人耳来说,要感知与120分贝、1000Hz声音相同的响度,所需的声强要小得多。相反,对于0phon的低频段,曲线显著上升,表明人耳对于非常安静的声音在低频段有显著的辨别能力。
Since the vertical axis is in decibels, the flat horizontal line at 65dB represents an equal intensity at all frequencies. The example sounds A, B, C and D all have the same sound intensity of 65dB. However, this does not imply that they have the same loudness to the human ear. We can say that sounds A and D have the same loudness since both are on the same equal loudness curve. This curve passes through 60dB at 1000Hz, so we characterize all sounds on that equal loudness curve, including sounds A and D, as having a loudness of 60 phons. Sound B is above the 60 phon curve, so that implies that it would be perceived as louder than A or D. In fact, since sound B is at 1000Hz and has an intensity of 65 dB, we can say that its loudness is 65 phons. The perceived loudness at 1000 Hz is the reference point for defining the equal loudness curve through that point, so the numerical value of phons and dB is always the same at 1000 Hz. Finally, we could say that sound C at 65dB is the loudest of the four sounds since it shows the greatest displacement above the 60 phon curve. From this graph, we cannot determine what that phon level is; that would require experimental comparison with 1000 Hz tones.
由于垂直轴以分贝为单位,65dB的水平直线表示所有频率都有相同的强度。示例声音A、B、C和D的强度均为65dB。然而,这并不意味着它们对人耳来说有相同的响度。我们可以认为声音A和D的响度相同,因为它们位于同一条等响曲线之上。这条曲线在1000Hz时为60dB,因此我们可以将所有位于该等响曲线上的声音,包括声音A和D,描述为具有60phon的响度。声音B位于60phon曲线之上,因此意味着它会被感知为比A或D更响。事实上,由于声音B在1000Hz时强度为65dB,我们可以说它的响度为65phon。在1000Hz处的响度是定义通过该点的等响曲线的参考点,因此在1000Hz时,phon和dB的数值总是相同的。最后,我们可以认为声音C在65dB时是四个声音中最响的,因为它在60phon曲线上方的位移最大。从这张图中,我们无法确定该phon水平的具体值;这需要与1000Hz的纯音进行实验比较。 |
Index Loudness concepts Hearing concepts 索引 响度概念 听觉概念 | ||
|
Go Back
返回 |